Corporate accounting Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Corporate accounting - Assignment Example CSL Behring has its operations spread over several countries like Australia, US, Germany and Switzerland. The company has around 10000 employees spread across 27 countries all over the world. BioCSL carries out operation from Melbourne and caters medical solutions to customers all over the world. The group accounts also reveal that CSL Limited carries out research and development to support its global operations. CSL Behring carries out activities of developing and marketing blood plasma derivative and recombined medical solution, bio-therapies for its customers all over the globe. The bio-therapies of the company provides solutions in developing immune systems against diseases like haemophilia, hereditary syndromes, von Willebrand, angioedema etc. The therapy solution developed by the companies also used for treating heart diseases, burns and shocks, transplantation of organs and also for treatment of newly born babies. BioCSL is another subsidiary that carries out the function of developing anti-influenza vaccines, anti-venom and diagnostic reagents to the global markets like Papua New Guinea, New Zealand, Asia-Pacific, etc. The research and development wing of the company is dedicated to support the bio-pharmaceutical business by developing protein-based medicines which are sold in licensed versions. The company is focussed on developing the existing products as well as developing break-t hrough solutions through use of DNA technologies. The research and development wing is also looking at improving their capabilities in the area of haemophilia, blood coagulation, etc. The non-controlling interests of CSL Limited could be understood from the following table as given below. The percentage of shareholding of the company by the various shareholders has been given in the following table. The percentage of shareholdings of the shareholders has been depicted in descending form. Since CSL

Risk vs Hagiography Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Risk vs Hagiography - Research Paper Example Plutarch’s account of the â€Å"War of Spartacus† as it was also called is contained within his Life of Crassus, a biography of the noted Roman general Marcus Licinius Crassus. Crassus was the one primarily responsible for the defeat of Spartacus’s uprising, and Plutarch’s account is primarily concerned with fitting the episode into the context of Crassus’s life and career. There are some minor differences on matters of fact between the two accounts, but on the whole they represent two very different readings of the same events.Appian’s account begins with an impartiality that might well be taken as sympathy for Spartacus and his cause. He speaks of the desire for freedom that initially motivated Spartacus and seventy fellow slaves to rebel against the gladiatorial school at which they were kept, and adds that Spartacus’s habit of dividing plunder equally among his followers led to him having a great many followers (Appian 217). Much o f the focus is on the official response, which Appian criticizes. He states that the government of Rome did not consider this a war in any real sense, but something more akin to robbery or public disruption (Appian 218). The implication seems to be that this was a short-sighted and ill-considered attitude.Plutarch also offers something resembling sympathy to Spartacus, placing the blame for the uprising on Lentulus Batiatus, the owner of the gladiatorial school, implying that his inhumane management of the school and poor treatment of the gladiators was responsible for the uprising.... Much of the focus is on the official response, which Appian criticizes. He states that the government of Rome did not consider this a war in any real sense, but something more akin to robbery or public disruption (Appian 218). The implication seems to be that this was a short-sighted and ill-considered attitude. Plutarch also offers something resembling sympathy to Spartacus, placing the blame for the uprising on Lentulus Batiatus, the owner of the gladiatorial school, implying that his inhumane management of the school and poor treatment of the gladiators was responsible for the uprising (Plutarch 337). Plutarch’s account, being specifically a military biography, concerns itself with the weapons and tactics employed by the slaves, and how the initial Roman forays against them, led by Clodius and Publius Varinus, were emphatically repulsed (Plutarch 340). Both accounts agree that Spartacus was attempting to reach and cross the Alps, so that he and the other foreign slaves coul d disperse to their countries of origin, escaping the Roman yoke. The fear, however, was that he might change his mind and march on Rome with an army that, at its peak, numbered 70,000. Plutarch’s account focuses much more on Crassus’s maneuvering and decisions regarding the war, including his decimation of a legion that had, in his estimation, shown cowardice (Plutarch 343). Appian deals in broader strokes during this middle portion of the war, and keeps more of the focus on Spartacus’s army and their defensive positioning. The two authors also differ in which parts of Spartacus’s campaign they emphasize. Appian mentions the town of Thurii, which Spartacus took and held (Appian 220), but Plutarch glosses over that part, focusing more on the